Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and laparoscopic surgery efficacy and renal function outcomes for large and complex renal calculi

Background There is limited published evidence regarding the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative events and the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in supine and prone positions and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy on kidney function in patients with large and complex calculi. Materials and methods We evaluated the surgical outcomes of 97 patients with large and complex kidney stones. The patients were divided into 3 groups: those who underwent PCNL in the prone position, PCNL in the supine position, and pyelolithotomy by laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy. General surgical outcomes, size of residual stones, stone-free rate, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and split GFR obtained from Tc-99m renal dynamic scintigrams were analyzed. Results Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position was correlated with improved function of the affected kidney. In the supine PCNL group, none of the analyzed indicators demonstrated a significant difference. Dynamic nephroscintigrams revealed negative changes in terms of accumulation and secretion of the affected kidney. A slight decrease in creatinine clearance was noted. However, positive dynamics in split GFR and secretory index were seen in this group. The laparoscopic group showed positive results in all analyzed parameters. However, full assessment of the function of the affected kidney in this group was limited due to restricted use of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for complex stones. Conclusions Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position resulted in the most favorable renal functional outcomes for patients with high-grade renal calculi, whereas a laparoscopic approach may be preferred for patients with stones of lower grades. The most significant factors that adversely affected renal function were intraoperative bleeding volume, kidney stone size and density, and body mass index. © 2024 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Авторы
Pak Yuriy 1 , Kalyagina Nina A. 2, 3 , Yagudaev Daniel M. 4, 5
Издательство
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Номер выпуска
4
Язык
English
Страницы
268-272
Статус
Published
Том
18
Год
2024
Организации
  • 1 City Center of Urology, City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • 2 Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 3 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 4 RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 5 Central Clinical Hospital, Joint Stock Company "Russian Railways", Moscow, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
Dynamic nephroscintigraphy; Large and complex renal calculi; Lithotripsy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Prone and supine positions; Renal function
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи

Avatkov V.A., Apanovich M.Yu., Borzova A.Yu., Bordachev T.V., Vinokurov V.I., Volokhov V.I., Vorobev S.V., Gumensky A.V., Иванченко В.С., Kashirina T.V., Матвеев О.В., Okunev I.Yu., Popleteeva G.A., Sapronova M.A., Свешникова Ю.В., Fenenko A.V., Feofanov K.A., Tsvetov P.Yu., Shkolyarskaya T.I., Shtol V.V. ...
Общество с ограниченной ответственностью Издательско-торговая корпорация "Дашков и К". 2018. 411 с.
Markin S.S., Ponomarenko Elena Alexandrovna, Romashova Yulia A., Pleshakova Tatyana Olegovna, Ivanov S.V., Beregovykh V.V., Konstantinov Sergey L., Stryabkova G.I., Chefranova Zh Yurievna, Lykov Yu A., Karamova Irina M., Koledinskii Anton G., Shestakova Ksenia Mikhailovna, Markin Pavel A., Moskaleva Natalia E., Appolonova Svetlana A.
Scientific Reports. Том 14. 2024.