Some ‘indicators’ to measure patriotism in the globalizing world

Today there are diverse trends (such as government’s intervention into the\r\nprivate lives of people, reduction of state’s support and impact in the social sphere, and globalization that makes the world smaller) that complicate the sociological study of patriotism\r\nin a ‘traditional’ way – as a value orientation ‘measured’ by simple questions about one’s\r\nknowledge, feelings, actions, and self-identification. Thus, it is necessary to identify several\r\nframeworks for the empirical study of patriotism. The first ‘dimension’ is traditional ‘patriotic mood’ – a set of stable cognitive, affective and behavioral value orientations. The second\r\n‘dimension’ consists of different components of the social well-being associated primarily\r\nwith the estimates of life in the country. The third ‘dimension’ consists of persistent stereotypes of the neighboring and other countries in the geopolitical context. The fourth ‘dimension’ is a result of the political decisions considering national security issues. Russia’s political\r\nleaders connect food trade to national security; therefore, ‘food insecurity’ is to a great extent\r\nmanufactured for political reasons to bolster national security or (food) nationalism.