Reducing financial toxicity in bladder cancer care

Purpose of review Financial toxicity is a significant concern for many individuals with bladder cancer, which is, overall, the most expensive malignancy, per patient. Financial toxicity, defined as the harmful effects of treatment costs on an individual's quality of life, is associated with worse outcomes and decreased quality of life. Awareness of the objective and subjective factors that contribute to financial toxicity, and ways to mitigate their effects on patients, is essential to reduce the burden of bladder cancer care. This commentary aims to discuss the elements contributing to financial toxicity amongst bladder cancer patients, identify at-risk populations, and review current and potential strategies for mitigating financial burden. Recent findings Bladder cancer is becoming more expensive as the use of novel therapies increases. Early data suggest how some of these novel treatments or changes in treatment delivery may impact costs. Potential innovative strategies for cost reduction include blue light cystoscopy, intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel rather than BCG for high-risk nonmuscle-invasive patients, home BCG therapy, and surveillance guideline optimization. However, there is still much work to be done on the potential impacts of these treatment on financial toxicity. While there is a paucity of data on treatment changes to reduce financial toxicity, and cost data can be hard to access, clinicians can still reduce the financial burden of cancer care. Awareness, financial toxicity screening, cost communication, and/or early referral to financial navigators or other similar resources have the potential to reduce financial burden. Despite mounting evidence, these tools/techniques are largely underutilized. Summary Many individuals with bladder cancer face significant financial toxicity, with the potential for this to worsen in the setting of rising treatment costs. Novel diagnostic and treatment modifications may reduce financial toxicity. However, awareness, screening, cost discussions, and utilization of financial navigators are tools/techniques that are currently available and should be used to reduce financial burden.

Авторы
Kurnot J.A. 1 , Kaye D.R. 1, 2, 3, 4
Издательство
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Номер выпуска
6
Язык
Английский
Страницы
484-488
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
34
Год
2024
Организации
  • 1 Department of Urology
  • 2 Duke-Margolis Center for Public Policy, Duke University
  • 3 Duke Cancer Institute
  • 4 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи

Аватков В.А., Апанович М.Ю., Борзова А.Ю., Бордачев Т.В., Винокуров В.И., Волохов В.И., Воробьев С.В., Гуменский А.В., Иванченко В.С., Каширина Т.В., Матвеев О.В., Окунев И.Ю., Поплетеева Г.А., Сапронова М.А., Свешникова Ю.В., Фененко А.В., Феофанов К.А., Цветов П.Ю., Школярская Т.И., Штоль В.В. ...
Общество с ограниченной ответственностью Издательско-торговая корпорация "Дашков и К". 2018. 411 с.