KANT'S ETHICOTHEOLOGY IN THE PERCEPTION OF N. P. ROZHDESTVENSKY AND F. A. GOLUBINSKY IN THE CONTEXT OF RECEPTION OF KANT’S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE LATE 18TH — MID-19TH CENTURY IN RUSSIA; [ЭТИКОТЕОЛОГИЯ КАНТА В ВОСПРИЯТИИ Н. П. РОЖДЕСТВЕНСКОГО И Ф. А. ГОЛУБИНСКОГО В КОНТЕКСТЕ РЕЦЕПЦИИ ПРАКТИЧЕСКОЙ ФИЛОСОФИИ КАНТА В КОНЦЕ XVIII — СЕРЕДИНЕ XIX В. В РОССИИ] ArticleKryshtop L.Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета. Серия 1: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2024. С. 65-85
TO THE STATEMENT OF A QUESTION ON PERIODIZATION OF HISTORY OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY ArticlePskhu R.V., Kryshtop L.E., Paribok A.V.Voprosy Filosofii. 2019. С. 146-163
THE RECEPTION OF THE INDIAN THOUGHT BY THE CULTURE AND ART OF EUROPE OF THE 20TH CENTURY ArticleKryshtop L., Pskhu R.PROCEEDINGS OF 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, LANGUAGE, ART AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION (ICELAIC 2017). Том 232. 2018. С. 5-8
THE DOCTRINE OF PIETISM: DID THE RELIGIOUS ENLIGHTENMENT EVER TAKE PLACE IN GERMANY? ArticleKryshtop L.E.FILOSOFSKII ZHURNAL. Том 11. 2018. С. 81-98
PHILOLOGIST VERSUS PHILOSOPHER ON THE TRANSLATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL TEXTS ArticlePskhu R., Zashchitina G., Kryshtop L., Danilova N., Kalashnikova L.PROCEEDINGS OF 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, LANGUAGE, ART AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION (ICELAIC 2017). Том 124. 2017. С. 61-64